IntelliSee AI fall detection overlay on senior living corridor camera feed
File #009 — Senior Living
Senior Living — Fall Detection

Memory Care Community. Zero Wearables.
Zero Elopement Incidents.

A 120-bed memory care and assisted living community deployed IntelliSee across existing corridor cameras to detect falls, wandering patterns, and after-hours elopement risk — alerting nursing staff within seconds without any device on any resident.

120Resident Beds
$0Wearable Devices
SecondsFall-to-Alert Time
0Elopement Incidents Post-Deployment
0Elopement Incidents Post-Deployment
Before deployment, the facility's only elopement detection was a door alarm that triggered after a resident had already exited. IntelliSee's loitering detection flagged approach behavior before exit attempts escalated — enabling redirection at the corridor, not the door.
Senior Living & Memory Care
Fall Detection
Unauthorized Access
Loitering
Midwest, USA
2025
The Threat Landscape

Sundowning. Night Shifts. A Door Alarm That Fires Too Late.

Elopement — the unsupervised departure of a memory care resident from a secured facility — is among the most serious adverse events in senior living. The Alzheimer's Association estimates that 60% of individuals with dementia will wander at some point during their illness. The legal and regulatory consequences of an elopement incident are severe; the human consequences are potentially irreversible.

The facility's overnight nursing staff operated at a ratio that made continuous corridor monitoring impossible. Existing door alarms triggered on exit — too late for safe intervention in a resident who had already cleared the secured perimeter. The staff had identified a behavioral pattern they called 'exit-seeking': residents who would approach secured exits repeatedly during sundowning hours, hours before any alarm was possible. There was no system to detect and alert on that early behavior. There was only the alarm at the door — and the scramble that followed.

Before Deployment
Elopement detection: door alarm — fires after exit, not before
Overnight staff ratio made continuous corridor monitoring impossible
Exit-seeking behavior visible on cameras — no alert generated
Falls discovered during rounds — average discovery gap: 34 minutes on overnight shifts
Wearable device trial: low compliance, battery burden, resident resistance
The Paradigm Shift

Reactive Surveillance vs. Proactive Safety

Before IntelliSee
Door alarm fires after resident has already exited secured area
Falls discovered during scheduled nursing rounds
Exit-seeking behavior undetected until door alarm activation
Wearable devices require resident compliance and staff battery management
Documentation completed after adverse event occurs
With IntelliSee
Loitering-at-exit detection alerts before resident reaches door
Fall detected within seconds — alert to nursing station with camera location
Corridor approach patterns monitored 24/7 without wearables
Zero compliance burden placed on any resident
Every alert logged automatically for care documentation and regulatory review
Deployment Record

Overnight Coverage Without Overnight Staffing Increases

IntelliSee was connected to all corridor, common area, and exit approach cameras during a single afternoon. No resident was affected. No camera was repositioned. Fall detection was configured across all residential corridors and common areas; loitering detection on all exit approach corridors and secured door approaches; unauthorized access on external perimeter zones adjacent to resident areas.

Alert routing sent fall detections to the nursing station serving each camera zone and the charge nurse's device simultaneously. Loitering-at-exit alerts went to the same routing path — flagging exit-seeking behavior before the resident reached the door, giving staff the window to redirect naturally rather than in response to an alarm event.

Camera Zones Covered
East Wing Resident Corridors
West Wing Resident Corridors
Memory Care Common Area
Dining Room Approaches
Secured Exit — East Approach
Secured Exit — West Approach
Outdoor Courtyard Perimeter
Main Entry — After Hours
Active Detection Types
Fall Detection
Posture transition to sustained floor position detected within seconds — alert to nursing station regardless of time of day
Loitering Detection
Extended lingering near secured exit approaches flagged — the earliest behavioral indicator of elopement attempt
Unauthorized Access
External perimeter zones and after-hours entry points monitored continuously
Detection Log — Verified Event Record
First Recorded Detection

East Wing. 3:41 AM. Tuesday.

Timestamp
3:41:12 AM
Camera
CAM-06 — East Wing Exit Approach
Classification
LOITERING DETECTED
Alert Sent
3:41:16 AM
Outcome
Resident Redirected at Corridor

At 3:41 AM, Camera 6 detected a resident who had been standing near the secured east wing exit approach for an extended period — a behavioral pattern that facility staff recognized as exit-seeking during sundowning. The loitering detection model classified the behavior and routed an alert to the overnight charge nurse in four seconds.

The charge nurse found the resident at the corridor approach — approximately 30 feet from the secured exit door — and redirected them toward the common area. No door alarm was triggered. No elopement attempt escalated. The resident was returned to their room and fell asleep within 20 minutes. Under the prior system, the next detection point would have been the door alarm — by which point the resident would have been at the exterior threshold in the middle of the night.

Event Metrics
4 secBehavior to Alert
CorridorInterception Point (Not Door)
0Elopement Attempts Escalated
Documented Results

Safety Built Around Dignity, Not Devices.

0Elopement Incidents Post-Deployment

Zero successful or attempted elopements escalated beyond the corridor interception point. Loitering-at-exit alerts enabled staff to redirect residents before any door approach.

SecondsFall-to-Alert Response Time

Fall detection alerts reached nursing staff within seconds of a floor event — compared to discovery times ranging from 20 to 47 minutes on overnight shifts under the prior model.

$0Wearable Devices on Any Resident

Every resident's detection ran from existing corridor cameras. No wearable. No pendant. No battery to manage. No compliance requirement placed on a resident with dementia.

Intelligence Brief

Fall Detection vs. Elopement Detection: Two Different AI Problems

Fall detection identifies a physical state: the transition from vertical to horizontal posture and sustained absence of upright motion. Elopement detection identifies a behavioral pattern: extended proximity to a secured exit during off-hours, a behavioral signature that precedes a departure attempt rather than documenting one.

These are architecturally different detection problems running on the same camera infrastructure. IntelliSee runs both simultaneously — fall detection on corridor cameras as a physical event classifier, loitering detection on exit approach cameras as a behavioral pattern classifier. For memory care environments, both are required. A fall detection-only system catches the event after it has occurred. A combined system catches the precursor behavior before the event escalates.

The door alarm told us when they left. IntelliSee tells us when they're thinking about leaving. That's the difference between a crisis and a conversation.
Director of Nursing, Midwest Memory Care Community
Get Started

Your Residents Deserve Safety That
Never Looks Away.

We'll map your corridors, exit approaches, and highest-risk overnight zones against your existing camera positions and show you what fall and wandering detection looks like for your specific floor plan.